keine Informationen
🕗 öffnungszeiten
Sonntag | ⚠ | |||||
Montag | ⚠ | |||||
Dienstag | ⚠ | |||||
Mittwoch | ⚠ | |||||
Donnerstag | ⚠ | |||||
Freitag | ⚠ | |||||
Samstag | ⚠ |
111 Odongdo-ro, 한려동 Yeosu, Jeollanam-do, South Korea
kontakte telefon: +82 61-660-5800
webseite: www.sonohotelsresorts.com
größere karte und wegbeschreibungLatitude: 34.7422879, Longitude: 127.7542821
gunn park
::Great service, extremely clean room with great view of the ocean. Concierge and all the staff are extremely friendly and helpful. Good location and easy access to visit other attractions. I highly recommend this hotel. You won't be disappointed.
Aymeric
::Stunning view and rooms! Great location! Great sky lounge and facilities (loved the sauna) Points to enhance: - The cleaning of the room was quite bad compared to the previous 3 stars hotel we stayed the night before - The pricing of the breakfast (90K for a 180K room for 2 people is just insane) - The English level for the concierge
Wayne Tucker
::Great location on the waterfront! Easy to walk to the island and the cable car, as both are right there. Lots of restaurants are close by, and a GS25 quick stop in the hotel. We have stayed many times at other Sono hotels. This was our most expensive stay and uncertain why so expensive. The family suite was okay but not renovated since the hotel was built (or at least it looks that way) The cleaning isn't very good, and everything in the hotel is overpriced.
Joe Kim
::very strict 3pm check in and will charge half room rate if you need to check in early. rooms are decent size but bathroom configuration is a bit odd. stay here for the location
June
::It was a good stay but I would say it was more like a 4 stars hotel than 5 stars. They have a weird system of checking in only after 1pm (or 2pm). They said that they assign the room in first come first serve manner. We just wanted to leave our luggage and go for lunch lol However, it has quite nice view and definitely one of better hotels in Yeosu. Most expensive coffee and Glühwein in my life, yet the price-quality ratio was not right… :)